Monday, September 20, 2010
Week 9 Lecture Summary
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
PRINTED TEE DAY!!
Week 8 TuteSpark and Activity
Negative Impact of technology on humanity: In a cyberpunked near-future, technology runs rampant, and usually manipulates most societal interactions. Dystopian near futures are very common, but so are futures where the impacts of specific technologies are played out in a world only slightly different from the present. Sacred societal boundaries are often crossed with regularity. Often the earth is severely damaged. Crime and drug use are often key supporting themes.
Week 8 Lecture Summary
This week's lecture was on "Virtual Philosophy". I managed to stay listening the whole time to this lecture but it was extremely difficult because I really didn't understand what he was talking about. His enthusiasm made you want to listen and follow along, but yeah, definitely over my head. Although a majority of it was over my head, I did understand some aspects of those.
Plato was bought up numerous times (pictured right >>) which I find incredible. I personally love the writings of Aristotle more so than Plato, but the fact that centuries later we still use their theories, philosophies and texts as guidelines and explanations today, shows how timeless and brilliant their work was.
The lecturer said that we can say that philosophy was created out of poetry. This can be see through the works of many Greek philosophers. When studying the texts it is seen that they "thread together".
Parmenides, another philosopher said that "whatever is, is". This particular philosophy has been passed down the centuries as people now quote it as "whatever will be, will be".
But back to Plato. One of his philosophies were that stuff is there, but it has different appearences. For example: A chair. But there are different types of chairs. And does a park bench classify as a chair? We sit on it. So it must be?
We also went through the "Allegory of the Cave". I found a website that helped explain it in clearer, simpler terms. http://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/cave.htm
I won't deconstruct the allegory all over again, but basically it is just an easy explaination as to what we do with the concept of reality.
One last point I found really interesting was anxiety. I suffer from anxiety at time to time when I feel I cannot handle a situation. But really what the lecturer said is very true. Anxiety is the fear of being afraid of fear. He said how people need to treat the reality in our heads and manipulate the material message to another.
To me as interesting as philosophy is, questioning the world and all it's antics, is just....stupid and only leading to trouble.
Week 7 TuteSpark
It is ridiculously hard to use. Kind of looking forward to this assignment being over. Just saying. I am not tech-y...


I also used the OpenOffice program opposed to the Microsoft Word/ Publisher/ Powerpoint, etc.
This was noticably different. But like any program, it just takes a bit of getting used to. Like I still can't use Macs, they take time to figure out. OpenOffice was okay. I still definitely prefer Microsoft Word and Powerpoint. They have more options as to what I can do and like to do, but id I got stuck only using OpenOffice, it wouldn't be awful because it is a decent program.
Week 7 Tute Activity
Creative commons, which is something I have been able to talk about in a previous blog, just to outline what it is.
Copyright is when someone owns their work, so "All Rights Reserved", while creative commons is "Some Rights Reserved".

share, expand, revise and remix.
It would be really good for university students, like myself, to "enhance our experience".
Knowing about the CC licencing framework, gives us the ability to know where to draw the line. We can use CC licenced pictures, videos, etc. to help us with our assignments but we know not to tamper with the copyrighted projects are artworks.
I have had to do a few YouTube videos as assignments for various subjects in this course so far, and one problem we did have was with copyrighted music. I didn't know you couldn't use it, because everyone else uses it. Haha....good excuse. But with this sort of new knowledge you can figure out as to what you can use, upload, share and remix.
I now also know that without a C symbol on it I am not allowed to distribute and tamper with someone else artwork on these YouTube videos.
Knowing about the licencing frameworks is going to be handy, not only in the process of making YouTube videos, but through many assignments as well.
Well I am going to have to go with the amazing band, "Radiohead". They are a prime example of using the CC licence. I remember when their song 'House of Cards' came out, and it was announced that they did it all under a CC licence. Not that I actually knew what that meant...but that is completely beside the point.
Example 2:
Alright. Well Flickr. I personally love this site. For my friends I will write a poem and add matching pictures from this website to the powerpoint. So this website is just great for people to be able to show their artwork.

3. Find an article about Creative Commons
Summary of the Article:This article goes into the negative implications and pitfalls that Creative Commons have. The impacts are mostly on our cultural environment really. It will change the distribution and production of the future creative projects that will come.
It also, as the title states, analyses the creative common licensing framework.
Monday, September 13, 2010
Week 6 TuteSpark
Who owns the content you put on the internet on various sites?
Well the website does. You are uploading your content onto their website. They can use it and distribute how they please. It most likely would be on their terms and conditions, that these days nobody reads.
Yeah, I mean it is their website. They have the right to take down anything they don't like one there as well.
Think about all the content you upload onto social networking sites - Do you own it?
No. They do. They own the pictures that you decided to upload. You may have taken the photo and may have copyright to taking the picture, but you don't actually own the picture.
Who has the right to use your creations?
Assignment Update
http://www.facebook.com/?sk=2361831622#!/group.php?gid=122432564473500
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Week 7 Lecture Summary


Monday, September 6, 2010
Update Update Update on Assignment!
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Week 6 Lecture Summary
So I learnt quite a bit this lecture.
Adam Muir was our guest lecturer and he helped define a few things.
Technology- 'Scientific study of mechanical acts and their application to the world'.
But what he pointed out that I found really interesting was technology is useless if you don't have the knowledge to use it. This was a really valid point. This is a major generalisation, but mature people usually have difficulty using technology because they haven't got the knowledge.
Media- 'When technology is used for social and cultural communication that technology becomes a medium of communication'.
Virtual Community
- way to explain a group of people who communicate via the internet.
while
Individual Identity
- way to explain how people express who they are via the internet. Examples- are like nicknames.
So this is how I came to understand.
The Virtual Community, was especially popular when the internet was not as popular as it is now. People got to socialise with other people with similar interests, so it was creating a community.
The Individual Identity follows the same concept that our current generation follows. It is all about 'me'. The internet and social networking is about people "promoting" themselves. People have the websites pages to show everyone their opinion, their pictures, their life. This apparently has a name called the ego-centric social network, which is pretty self-explanatory.
This is what I really got out of the lecture. There were heaps of other points, but this is what I really took away from it.